"I have to spend my whole life defending them, and then I get two tossers sitting there, telling me how I feel."
Bianca
Only on Big Brother would a pivotal moment of conflict be a screaming match about.... well.... tits. If Big Brother is truly a window to this society, yada, yada, yawn, then what a tit-obsessed society this is! No matter what happens on the show, no matter where it goes, it always seems to come back to them. Brigette and Rebecca have fake tits, Dixie can't do the laundry because of her tits, Alice and Renee deal with having small tits, Rory only likes Dixie because of her big tits, and Bianca... well... Bianca is a girl caught in the cross-fire of this tit-obsession. On the one hand, she's an 18 year old girl who wants, as anyone else her age does, to embody and flower as a sexual entity, but must navigate sexuality and her society with very blurred lines - blurred by those very large breasts she must venture into this world with. You do have to understand, to some degree, what this girl does go through, and why she is such a paradox.
"If you're going to engage it, you might as well think about it."
The Eye
Recently, I was interviewed by the wonderful Daz Chandler about this here website. This is actually for a programme that deals with ways of exploring and using Australian media and entertainment, so it's more about the process and purpose of blogging BB. Although this has already aired in Sydney, excerpts from this interview will be aired on various stations around the country (I'll let you know, anyway). However, since some stations may choose to edit it, I thought I'd give you the full deal. Simply click on this link and play the file!
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
Written by The Eye
Wednesday, 04 June 2008
Well, you can't. But you can always type it, of course! Don't forget about our Your Say page, where you can have your own rant, via the Contact form. But for those people registering for our Chatroom, whilst I've nothing against the odd daytime chit-chat whenever they occur (and they do), please be aware that this room generally comes to life after the nightly shows (usually around 9.00pm, onwards). Simply register with your nickname, and away you go! It's simple, and results in no email offers for cheap Viagra. I promise! Everyone is very nice, and there's none of that clique stuff going on (but if anyone squirts you in the eyes with shower cleaner, please let me know). And whilst the topics generally revolve around... well, der.... Big Brother, anything and everything is up for grabs. Go on... relive the IRC era, and jump in the deep end of cyberspace, where personal interaction isn't too much for modern human beings to deal with (remember that?!). I dare 'ya.
WHAT YOU WEREN'T SHOWN...
Written by The Eye
Tuesday, 03 June 2008
"I think Terri and Nobbi are secretly in love with each other."
Tony Squires (last night)
So said the man who once had some of the country convinced he made intelligent journalistic choices (that's out the widow, now). This quote of Squires' came after the show ran with a segment featuring Nobbi having some "fun" with Terri, pretending to be a phone-sex caller looking for some "older" action. Terri, as best as she could, played along. But the show knew very well that this was now aired after another incident where the joke, it seemed, had gone too far.
God bless the detectives of cyberspace. First, they captured and zoomed in on Ben's "shower gel" to realise that it was actually shower cleanser - not soap (as the show tried to have us believe). Now, there's another incident of the Three Amigos' bullying that has been caught out by BB fans, on live feed (which is how anyone ever come to know about Turkeyslap, another incident that would have been swept under the rug, if it were not for outraged cyberfans). It's not on the same level of Turkeyslap, no; but this moment, where Nobbi becomes extremely aggressive, after Terri dislikes him discussing her mastubating and "lactating", became a hot topic on the late-night forum boards, and many women - quite understandably - found this quite unsettling, and are wondering why the show is covering up this kind of behaviour from one of the most popular housemates of the series (Centrebet currently has Nobbi to take out the crown). Again, whilst Nobbi has been given a strike for not sticking to his task, the apparently "serious" code concerning "the treatment of each other", etc, is nowhere to be seen - even when housemates are quite clearly victimised and uncomfortable with the treatment they are receiving, as is the case in this scene. In a letter on the Your Say page, I predicted that a) The show would choose to sweep this incident under the rug, and that b) It would only get a leg on, if someone managed to capture it and post it in cyberspace. Tick both those boxes! Below is the charming moment that led to Terri nominating Nobbi, but one that the show decided would be best if nobody watched. Fortunately, we get to watch it. Enjoy. If that's the word. Which it isn't.
eviction 4 - FAREWELL, DIXIE! GOODBYE, KYLE?
Written by The Eye
Monday, 02 June 2008
"I think it's my time."
Dixie
Last night, I decided the hospitalisation of Travis was just too integral to our following of the show; but it just wouldn’t be right to let Dixie go, without saying goodbye. That was that, I guess – Big Brother’s first Aboriginal housemate. And how did she go? With a ferocious, white Queensland audience, booing and jeering, along with a production that was more than happy to deliver the Fat Lazy Aboriginal Girl™, amidst a continuing barrage of criticisms and crass jokes designed to play up her piggish love for bad food. I wouldn’t have expected anything less.
PLEASE NOTE: IT HAS NOW BEEN REVEALED THAT THE TRAVIS INCIDENT DID NOT ACTUALLY INVOLVE "SHOWER GEL", AS SUCH (AS THE SHOW INFERRED), BUT SHOWER MOULD REMOVER.
It’s hypocritical, Big Brother – and always has been – because, on the one hand, it likes to flaunt that it creates a controlled environment, where the authority of Big Brother is used to direct what goes on in those four walls. It does. But, then, it’s always been very clever at wiping its hands clean, when the moment – or the criticism, more to the point – suits it to, pointing the finger at (but, of course!) the uncontrollable nature of "reality". Three years ago, I first landed on the BB (and media) radar, because I put forward what was, at the end of the day, a rather logical proposition. If you control an environment, to that extent, you are effectively responsible for what goes on within it, as a result. What happens is a product of the ethos of that environment, and, in an environment that had actively promoted the sexual victimisation of women as entertainment, the Turkeyslap was a train we should have all seen coming. I actually did. But, in fairness, I always found it so hilarious that it was considered shocking that I did. Guess I had the last laugh (as unfortunate as that was for Camilla, and the thousands of women who watch Big Brother).
"i remember feeling like you've been asked to do something, but you wanna do it."
Alice
Last week, there was a scurry of press attention, surrounding Peter Powers' appearance in the Big Brother house. This was actually one of those times when the show probably would have been happy to have the coverage (I even wondered if they'd pushed this one, themselves), because this is one "furore" that was never going to lead anywhere. Stage hypnosis is still a part of popular culture - particularly within the working class, where stage hypnotists travel the "Workers' Club" circuit). Quite frankly, nobody cares if a shrink or two thinks it's exploitative; and, when you get down to the nitti-gritti of hypnosis, the lines are still blurred, and the conversation is certainly not one the everyday public can (or would bother to) understand. That said, I'm going to try to put it in context for you, here. Ultimately, even professional, academic and "scientific" ideas of hypnosis are by no means in a collective consensus on this one. So there's not a great deal that is, ultimately, "absolute". But what everyone does agree on, certainly takes on an interesting meaning, when applied to the mind of people who happily let us watch them in that house.
Since Sunday's double departure of Nathan and Cult Buster, the
action has been a little thin on the ground. In some ways, this became
perfect timing for the "Dog House" competition, which made some
light-hearted and relatively amusing viewing, last night. Big Mouth
finally fell off my blogging radar, with the most ordinary hour of
television I've seen in some time - there was nothing bad to say,
particularly, and certainly nothing good. The low-level smut was spread
over an entire hour, and even Gleeson - who refreshed the show, last
week, with his dry attacks that did such a good job at addressing the
demographic who actually quite despise the show (growing in numbers,
this year, it would appear) - seemed dumbed down and restrained. I buckled in, tonight, hoping something would
revive this situation with something - anything - to discuss.
"We've all worked out that this was all Big Brother's fault."
Brigette
There is trouble in Surfer's Paradise, in case anyone hasn't noticed,
for Australia's iconic reality show. In a make or break year, the only
"car accident" currently pulling attention is the show itself,
increasingly derailed by poor production and transparent desperation.
Even Carson couldn't pull the numbers, this week. By tonight, alarm
bells were ringing, when a sudden double eviction was announced. With
no time given to market this double eviction (meaning that this
actually wasn't an attempt to translate the eviction into ratings), one
is left to wonder if they're simply speeding the show up towards a
potentially finite end. Sundays have proven to be a thorn in this season's
side, and tonight was no exception, with another half an hour sucked up
by cross-promotion, a show now using the most simplistic forms of
wielding its authority to create conflict in the house, and another
live show where Kyle Sandilands showed us what a bad idea it was to
step up to Killeen's legacy. Oh, dear, Mr Brother. Whoever thought so
many people would agree with John Howard on something?
And so, the Princess' troubles were far from over. Knowing full well what the results in the group chemistry would be, Big Brother gave Brigette a task, to wear "rose coloured glasses", in an effort to have some of her belongings returned. The thing to remember, here, was that Brigette had actually calmed down and begun accepting her time in the house without her cosmetics and make-up. In fact, we had seen that the house had largely commended her, during a dinner session, on her ability to eventually deal with the situation. But that makes for dull television, in Big Brother world, and with the only action in the house now being the increasingly repetitive Nathan and Renee saga (who also initially seemed to have dealt with their situation, until Big Brother decided to rekindle the drama with another task decided to create chemistry and conflict), it was back to The Death Of A Princess (a story that had gained quite a lot of forum activity, a smidgen of press attention and a slight increase in ratings).
"That's my biggest problem with the way positive society goes..."
Terri
Wednesday night's Big Brother did, as we expected, continue along the
Nathan and Renee path. But it was the surrounding scenes that caught my
interest, and beneath the shallow bickering of the forum kiddies
("Nathan's a snake!" one side screams; "Nathan's a nice guy, he really
likes her!" scream the decidedly smaller half) was a collection of very
interesting conversations where (perhaps, at the risk of being
grandiose) we saw some of the problems of this democratic society -
and, of our collectivist social nature at the heart of it - in full
swing. "How the fuck does he get that from Big Brother?" you ask.
"Is Nathan Renee's leading man? Or is he leading her on?" This agenda-setting introduction by Goldman set the scene, off the bat, for what the dance task/cross-promotion is now being used to force: a love/heartbreak narrative. So, regardless of what truth it brings out, it's important to remember that we are watching something they are forced to do. It's fair to analyse Nathan's behaviour around this task, but wrong to be wound up by the deliberate implications of a forced routine that makes them "pretend" to be in love. While we're all worried about the question being put to us, "Is Nathan leading her on?", don't forget to ask, "Is Big Brother leading her on?" If you know someone is having difficulty with a crush, you can't really expect the dynamic to resolve itself, when you're forcing that person to look into the object of her affection's eyes, and dance the dance of love.